In October 2022, Intel released the 13th Gen Raptor Lake CPUs. While the high-end CPUs i.e., the Core i9 13900K and Core i7 13700K will offer excellent all-around performance (single core, gaming and multi-threaded), the mid-tier Core i5 13600K will get the most traction from gamers. A couple of months later, Intel released the Core i5 13400 and Core i5 13400F CPUs. If you already own a decent graphics card and don’t need the integrated graphics at all or not interested in overclocking, then the Intel Core i5 13400F seem like a decent purchase. But how does it compare with the “go to gaming CPU”, the Intel Core i5 13600K? Which is the better CPU? We will try to find answers to all these question in this Intel Core i5 13400F vs Intel Core i5 13600K comparison guide.
In the process, we will take a look at their basic specifications, compare their application and gaming performance. We will also take a look at their clock speeds, power consumption, and CPU temperatures. If you are looking to purchase a new CPU and confused between the Intel Core i5 13600K and Intel Core i5 13400F, then we hope that this guide could help you make a better buying decision.
A Brief Note on Intel Core i5 13400F
After successfully launching the regular 13th Gen CPUs, Intel recently launched a couple of non-overclockable CPUs. In that, the Intel Core i5 13400F is even special as the “F” in the name indicates that it doesn’t have any integrated graphics.
So, without overclocking feature and no integrated graphics, the cost of this CPU should be very low, right? Yes. The launch price of the Intel Core i5 13400F is just $196.
The Intel Core i5 13400F has a combination of Performance or P Cores and Efficiency or E Cores. To be specific, it has 6 P Cores with support for multithreading and 4 E Cores without multithreading.
So, the Intel Core i5 13400F has a total of 10 Cores and 16 Threads. The base clock speed of the P and E Cores of 13400F are 2.5 GHz and 1.8 GHz respectively while the turbo clocks of P and E Cores are 4.6 GHz and 3.3 GHz respectively.
It also uses the same LGA 1700 Socket as the other 12th gen and 13th processors. The Intel Core i5 13400F CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 RAM types in dual channel mode with frequencies as DDR4-3200 and DDR5-4800.
Coming to the cache layout, each P core of the 13400F Processor gets 1.25 MB L2 Cache and one module of E cores gets 2 MB L2 Cache.
Speaking of E Core modules, Intel grouped four E Cores into a cluster that share the L2 cache. So, in 13400F, you get 2 MB for four E Cores. This makes the total L2 Cache of 12900K at 9.5 MB. It also has 20 MB L3 Cache, which is common for all the cores.
The Intel Core i5 13400F processor has 20 PCIe lanes from the CPU. Of these, 16 are PCIe Gen 5 while the remaining 4 are Gen 4. The 13th Gen Alder Lake processors are fabricated using the “Intel 7”. Even though Intel calls it “Intel 7”, it is technically a 10 nm node.
The base processor power of Intel Core i5 13400F CPU is 65W while the maximum turbo power is 148W.
Important Specifications of Intel Core i5 13400F
- 6 P Cores, 4 E Cores and total 16 Threads
- LGA 1700 Socket
- Supports both DDR4 and DDR5
- Cache: Total L2 Cache is 9.5 MB [1.25 MB per P Core (6 * 1.25 MB = 7.5 MB) 2 MB per E Core Module (1 * 2 MB = 2 MB)], Total L3 Cache is 20 MB
- Total 20 PCIe Lanes (16 PCIe 5.0 Lanes and 4 PCIe 4.0 Lanes)
- No Integrated Graphics
- No support for overclocking
- Base Power is 65 Watts and Turbo Power is 148 Watts
- Manufacturing Node is Intel 7 (based on 10 nm Enhanced SuperFin)
A Brief Note on Intel Core i5 13600K
In October 2022, Intel launched the 13th Gen processors with code name Raptor Lake. While the Core i9 13900K is an expensive, top-of-the-line processor of this generation (subsequently dethroned by Intel Core i9 13900KS), the Core i5 13600K is a relatively low-cost option with a launch price of $319.
Continuing the Hybrid Architecture from the 12th Gen Alder Lake processors, the Intel Core i5 13600K consists of 6 Performance (P) Cores and 8 Efficiency (E) Cores.
The performance cores support hyper threading but the efficiency cores don’t. So, the 6P + 8E Core 13600K supports 20 threads.
The base clock speed of the P and E Cores of 13600K are 3.5 GHz and 2.6 GHz respectively. The turbo clocks of P and E Cores are 5.1 GHz and 3.9 GHz respectively.
Intel made the 13th gen Raptor Lake processors using the same LGA 1700 Socket as the 12th Gen Alder Lake CPUs. So, if you have a decent motherboard, then the upgrade cost will be less.
The Intel Core i5 13600K CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 RAM types in dual channel mode. While the DDR4 frequency is only DDR4-3200, DDR5 saw a huge improvement with support for DDR5-5600.
Coming to the cache layout, each P core of the 13600K Processor gets 2 MB L2 Cache and one module of E cores gets 4 MB L2 Cache.
If you aren’t familiar with the E Core modules, Intel grouped four E Cores into a cluster that share the L2 cache. So, in 13600K, you get 4 MB for four E Cores. This makes the total L2 Cache of 13600K at 20 MB. It also has 24 MB L3 Cache, which is common for all the cores.
The Intel Core i5 13600K processor has 20 PCIe lanes from the CPU. Of these, 16 are PCIe Gen 5 while the remaining 4 are Gen 4. Similar to the Alder Lake processors, even the 13th Gen Raptor Lake processors are fabricated using the “Intel 7”. Even though Intel calls it “Intel 7”, it is technically a 10 nm node.
The base processor power of Intel Core i5 13600K CPU is 125W while the maximum turbo power is 181W.
Important Specifications of Intel Core i5 13600K
- 6 P Cores, 8 E Cores and total 20 Threads
- LGA 1700 Socket
- Supports both DDR4 and DDR5
- Cache: Total L2 is 20 MB [2 MB per P Core (6 * 2 MB = 12 MB) 4 MB per E Core Module (2 * 4MB = 8 MB)] and Total L3 is 24 MB
- Total 20 PCIe Lanes (16 PCIe 5.0 Lanes and 4 PCIe 4.0 Lanes)
- Intel UHD 770 Integrated Graphics
- Base Power is 125 Watts and Turbo Power is 181 Watts
- Manufacturing Node is Intel 7 (based on 10 nm Enhanced SuperFin)
Specifications: Intel Core i5 13400F vs Intel Core i5 13600K
In the following table, we made a side-by-side list of all the essential specifications of the Intel Core i5 13400F and the Intel Core i5 13600K.
| Intel Core i5 13400F | Intel Core i5 13600K | ||
| Cores (Threads) | Performance (P) | 6 (12) | 6 (12) |
| Efficient (E) | 4 (4) | 8 (8) | |
| Base Clock Rate | Performance (P) | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Efficient (E) | 1.8 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
| Turbo Clock Rate | Performance (P) | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Efficient (E) | 3.3 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
| Max Turbo Frequency (Max Single Core Frequency) | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz | |
| Cache | L2 | Total 9.5 MB
1.25 MB per P Core (6 * 1.25 MB = 7.5 MB) 2 MB per E Core Module (1 * 2 MB = 2 MB) |
Total 20 MB
2 MB per P Core (6 * 2 MB = 12 MB) 4 MB per E Core Module (2 * 4 MB = 8 MB) |
| L3 | 20 MB | 24 MB | |
| Power | Base Processor Power | 65 Watts | 125 Watts |
| Max Turbo Power | 148 Watts | 181 Watts | |
| Process | Intel 7 (10 nm) | Intel 7 (10 nm) | |
| Socket | LGA 1700 | LGA 1700 | |
| Code Name (Architecture) | Raptor Lake | Raptor Lake | |
| Microarchitecture | Performance (P) | Raptor Cove | Raptor Cove |
| Efficient (E) | Gracemont | Gracemont | |
| PCIe Lanes | Total 20
16 PCIe 5.0 Lanes 4 PCIe 4.0 Lanes |
Total 20
16 PCIe 5.0 Lanes 4 PCIe 4.0 Lanes |
|
| Memory Support | DDR4 | Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s |
| DDR5 | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s | |
| Integrated Graphics | — | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | |
| Price | $196 | $319 | |
Comparison of Intel Core i5 13400F and Core i5 13600K
Let us now compare the performance of the Intel Core i5 13400F CPU against the Intel Core i5 13600K.
Test System
Before we begin, here is a quick look at our Intel and AMD test systems.
| Intel Test System | ||
| CPUs | Intel Core i7 13700K | |
| Intel Core i5 13600K | ||
| Intel Core i5 13400F | ||
| Motherboard | MSI PRO Z790-A Wi-Fi | |
| Memory | G.Skill Trident Z5 (Intel XMP) 32GB (2 × 16GB) DDR5 6000 CL30 | |
| AMD DDR5 Test System | ||
| CPUs | AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | ||
| Motherboard | GIGABYTE X670E AORUS Master | |
| Memory | G.Skill Trident Z5 (AMD EXPO) 32GB (2 × 16GB) DDR5 6000 CL30 | |
| AMD DDR4 Test System | ||
| CPUs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | ||
| Motherboard | ASUS ROG X570 Crosshair VIII Hero | |
| Memory | G.Skill Trident Z 32GB (2 × 16GB) DDR4 3600 CL16 | |
| Common to All Test Systems | ||
| SSD | SAMSUNG 980 PRO SSD 1TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe | |
| CPU Cooler | Corsair iCUE H150i RGB Elite Liquid CPU Cooler | |
| Power Supply | Seasonic PRIME 1300 Platinum | |
| Graphic Card | MSI Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | |
| Software | Windows 11 21H2 | |
| Nvidia 526.47 | ||
Application Benchmarks
Cinebench R23 Multi-Core (Higher is Better)
Let us start with the most popular benchmark tool, the Cinebench R23. After the 10-minute multicore loop test, the Intel Core i5 13600K got a score of just over 24000 points while the Intel Core i5 13400F could only manage just over 16200 points.
If you compare the performance difference of Intel Core i5 13600K and Intel Core i5 13400F, then the former boasts a 48% performance advantage.
| Intel Core i7 13700K | 29973 |
| Intel Core i5 13600K | 24001 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | 20072 |
| Intel Core i5 13400F | 16223 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | 14983 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 14443 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 11569 |
Cinebench R23 Single-Core (Higher is Better)
Coming to the single core performance in the Cinebench R23, the story is the same. The single-core performance of the Intel Core i5 13600K is roughly 15% better than the Intel Core i5 13400F.
| Intel Core i7 13700K | 2045 |
| Intel Core i5 13600K | 1993 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | 1980 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | 1920 |
| Intel Core i5 13400F | 1736 |
| AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | 1594 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 1477 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 1453 |
PassMark’s CPUMARK 10.2 Multi-Threaded/Overall (Higher is Better)
Next, we have another popular benchmark tool from PassMark, the CPU Mark. The following results show the overall or multi-threaded CPU Mark Score of all the processors in this test.
The story is similar to the Cinebench Multi-threading test. Here the Intel Core i5 13600K scores just over 40000 points while the Intel Core i5 13400F scores just over 34500 points.
The performance gap between the Intel Core i5 13600K and the Intel Core i5 13400F is roughly 16% in favor of the former.
| Intel Core i7 13700K | 49443 |
| Intel Core i5 13600K | 40175 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | 37548 |
| Intel Core i5 13400F | 34587 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | 30005 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 29776 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 25993 |
PassMark’s CPUMARK 10.2 Single-Threaded (Higher is Better)
Coming to the single threaded performance in CPU Mark, the results are once again similar the previous single thread test. The Intel Core i5 13600K could score just over 4200 points while the Intel Core i5 13400F score under 3800 points.
| Intel Core i7 13700K | 4443 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | 4301 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | 4249 |
| Intel Core i5 13600K | 4237 |
| Intel Core i5 13400F | 3769 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 3480 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 3402 |
Blender Open Data Render Time (Lower is Better)
Another popular open-source tool is Blender. For the next couple of tests, we will see the render times and number of samples per minute in Blender version 3.4. The Intel Core i5 13600K took 40 seconds over 9 minutes while Intel Core i5 13400F 30 seconds over 14 minutes.
| Intel Core i7 13700K | 8 min 10 sec |
| Intel Core i5 13600K | 9 min 40 sec |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | 11 min 5 sec |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | 14 min 10 sec |
| Intel Core i5 13400F | 14 min 32 sec |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 14 min 50 sec |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 19 min 59 sec |
Blender Samples Per Minute (Higher is Better)
The results for number of samples in a minute for Blender Render is also very similar to the render time results. Here you can see the samples per minute score across the three test scenes: monster, junkshop, and classroom.
| Intel Core i7 13700K | 450.2 |
| Intel Core i5 13600K | 347.8 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | 310.5 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | 232.8 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 225.9 |
| Intel Core i5 13400F | 199.7 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 178.6 |
Adobe Photoshop 2022 Puget System Benchmark (Higher is Better)
The Adobe suite has a couple of important tools that many creators and artists use. We will start with the Adobe Photoshop 2022. It has a built-in Puget System Standard Benchmark.
If you look at the overall scores, the Intel Core i5 13400F falls short in front of the Intel Core i5 13600K by about 10%.
| Intel Core i7 13700K | 1546 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | 1460 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | 1430 |
| Intel Core i5 13600K | 1356 |
| Intel Core i5 13400F | 1242 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 1199 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 970 |
Adobe Premier Pro 2022 Puget System Benchmark (Higher is Better)
Next application in the Adobe suite is the Premier Pro 2022. In this test, the Intel Core i5 13600K scores just shy of 1100 points. This is 160 points more than the Intel Core i5 13400F.
| Intel Core i7 13700K | 1189 |
| Intel Core i5 13600K | 1089 |
| Intel Core i7 12700K | 1013 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | 999 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | 948 |
| Intel Core i5 13400F | 923 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 902 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 755 |
7-Zip File Manager Compression (Higher is Better)
One of the popular and widely used open-source applications is the 7-Zip File Manager. It helps in archiving files. For this test, we are performing the built-in benchmark feature. Here is the result in million instructions per second (MIPS) for compressing using a standards 32 MB dictionary size and 10 passes.
| Intel Core i7 13700K | 144443 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | 115469 |
| Intel Core i5 13600K | 123983 |
| Intel Core i5 13400F | 100251 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 90058 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | 88658 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 72006 |
7-Zip File Manager Decompression (Higher is Better)
In decompression, which usually favors AMD Ryzen CPUs, the Intel Core i5 13600K finishes with over 127K MIPS. But the Intel Core i5 13400F couldn’t get past 86K MIPS.
| Intel Core i7 13700K | 159468 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | 135879 |
| Intel Core i5 13600K | 127863 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 111026 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | 103958 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 88969 |
| Intel Core i5 13400F | 86214 |
Chromium Code Compilation Time (Lower is Better)
Developers working on large projects need a stable multi-threaded system with a powerful CPU. So, we tested the code compilation performance by taking the open-source Chromium project code.
The performance of Intel Core i5 13600K is not that great as it could finish the compilation in just over 69 minutes. Even worse, the Intel Core i5 13400F finished the compilation in over 87 minutes.
| Intel Core i7 13700K | 54 min 29 sec |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | 62 min 32 sec |
| Intel Core i5 13600K | 69 min 19 sec |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | 82 min 43 sec |
| Intel Core i5 13400F | 87 min 22 sec |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 92 min 43 sec |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 124 min 55 sec |
Corona 1.3 Render Time (Lower is Better)
The last “application” benchmark is the Corona 1.3, which is a high-quality shading engine for production rendering. Let us now see the rendering time of different Intel and AMD CPUs.
| Intel Core i7 13700K | 50 sec |
| Intel Core i5 13600K | 65 sec |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | 75 sec |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 88 sec |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | 96 sec |
| Intel Core i5 13400F | 100 sec |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 115 sec |
Gaming Benchmarks
Let us move to some gaming performance. We tested some popular titles at a resolution of 1920 × 1080 (1080p) as anything beyond, the GPU will dominate the performance. We are running all the games in DirectX 12 with Ray Tracing and DLSS off.
Far Cry 6
- Resolution: 1920 × 1080
- DirectX 12
- Game Setting: Ultra
- DirectX Raytracing: Off
The first game is Far Cry 6. Here, the Intel Core i5 13600K shows its dominance over Intel Core i5 13400F as the former got shy of 150 fps while the latter could only push 135 fps. Here are the rounded off average frames and also 1% low fps.
| CPU | Average FPS | 1% Low FPS (Min FPS) |
| Intel Core i7 13700K | 163 | 118 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 156 | 104 |
| Intel Core i5 13600K | 148 | 105 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | 147 | 101 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | 146 | 100 |
| Intel Core i5 13400F | 136 | 100 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 116 | 74 |
Cyberpunk 2077
- Resolution: 1920 × 1080
- DirectX 12
- Game Setting: Ultra
- Texture: High
- Ray Tracing: Off
- DLSS: Off
Next, we have another popular title, Cyberpunk 2077. The story is the same, where the Intel Core i5 13600K can pump over 140 fps on average while the Intel Core i5 13400F struggle to push past 130 fps.
| CPU | Average FPS | 1% Low FPS (Min FPS) |
| Intel Core i7 13700K | 148 | 123 |
| Intel Core i5 13600K | 143 | 121 |
| Intel Core i5 13400F | 133 | 113 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 127 | 109 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | 126 | 110 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | 125 | 109 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 123 | 108 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
- Resolution: 1920 × 1080
- DirectX 12
- Game Setting: High
- DLSS: Off
Last but not least, we tested the Shadow of the Tomb Raider. Unsurprisingly, the results are once again similar. The Intel Core i5 13600K could easily push over 230 fps while the Intel Core i5 13400F could only get over 190 fps.
What surprised in this game is the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D beating all the current gen Intel and AMD flagships. Based on this result, we are very excited to get our hands on the upcoming Ryzen 7000 Series CPUs with 3D V-Cache.
| CPU | Average FPS | 1% Low FPS (Min FPS) |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 280 | 178 |
| Intel Core i7 13700K | 254 | 161 |
| Intel Core i5 13600K | 233 | 152 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | 233 | 145 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | 230 | 139 |
| Intel Core i5 13400F | 192 | 134 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 184 | 110 |
Clock Speed
We ran the AIDA64 Stress Test for 10 minutes and here are the maximum frequency and average frequency of all cores.
| CPU | Maximum Frequency | All-Core Average Frequency |
| Intel | ||
| Intel Core i7 13700K | 5.4 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| Intel Core i5 13600K | 5.1 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Intel Core i5 13400F | 4.6 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| AMD | ||
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | 5.5 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | 5.4 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 4.5 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 4.6 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
CPU Temperature
During the same AIDA64 Stress Test, we monitored the CPU Temperatures with Corsair iCUE H150i RGB Elite Liquid CPU Cooler. Here are the CPU temps for your reference.
| CPU | Max Temp | Average Temp |
| Intel | ||
| Intel Core i7 13700K | 92°C | 69°C |
| Intel Core i5 13600K | 98°C | 73°C |
| Intel Core i5 13400F | 58°C | 51°C |
| AMD | ||
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | 87°C | 84°C |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | 83°C | 80°C |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 78°C | 75°C |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 80°C | 68°C |
Power Consumption
During the Blender render, we measured the CPU Package Power Draw using the HWiNFO tool. The following table consists of the peak CPU Package Power Draw as reported by HWiNFO.
| Intel | |
| Intel Core i7 13700K | 245 Watts |
| Intel Core i5 13600K | 220 Watts |
| Intel Core i5 13400F | 92 Watts |
| AMD | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | 143 Watts |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | 120 Watts |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 116 Watts |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 78 Watts |
Which is Better, Intel Core i5 13400F or Intel Core i5 13600K?
The retail price of both the Intel Core i5 13600K is $319 while it is $196 for the Intel Core i5 13400F. A clear $120 difference. We can see this difference even in performance.
From the above tests, it is clear that the Intel Core i5 13600K is worth spending the extra $100 odd bucks as you can easily get extra performance both in gaming as well as productivity applications.
The advantage of the Intel Core i5 13400F is it draws less power and runs way coolers than the Intel Core i5 13600K. For gaming or mild multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core i5 13600K is a much better choice than the Intel Core i5 13400F.
